From: "Alice Jay - Avaaz.org" <avaaz@avaaz.org>Date: February 23, 2011 12:58:56 AM GMT-04:00Subject: Libya: Stop the crackdownDear friends,
Libya's armed forces are using machine guns and fighter jets against pro-democracy protesters -- hundreds have been killed and, without immediate international action, it could spiral into a national bloodbath.
The United Nations Security Council is holding emergency sessions on Libya now. If we can pressure them to agree to a no-fly zone over Libya, an asset freeze on Qaddafi and his generals, targeted sanctions against the regime, and international prosecution of any military officials involved in the crackdown -- this could stop airforce bombings and split Qaddafi's command structure.
We have no time to lose -- the people of Libya are being slaughtered by their own government. Click to send a message directly to all the UN Security Council delegations to stop the violence, and share this with everyone -- let's spur the UN to action with a flood of messages:
http://www.avaaz.org/en/libya_stop_the_crackdown/?vl
Colonel Qaddafi has ruled with an iron fist for 42 years with no parliament or constitution. He is the longest-serving dictator in Africa and the Middle East. No foreign press are allowed in Libya, and the government has shut down the internet and mobile phone networks in an attempt to hide the brutal violence. But protesters, who are demanding regime change and basic rights, are reporting that thousands of people are still taking to the streets even though hundreds have been massacred. UN human rights chief Navi Pillay says the government's attacks 'may amount to crimes against humanity'.
Appalled by the atrocities, Libyan diplomats and some army high command have already defected from the regime. If the UN can ramp up the pressure on Qaddafi and his cohorts -- confiscating their riches and threatening them with trials -- those commanding the brutality may reconsider and stop the bloodshed.
The UN Security Council presidency is now held by Brazil, a government with a strong commitment to human rights with whom Avaaz has a strong campaigning reputation. We don't have long to influence the UNSC -- let's flood their inboxes with messages from across the world! Send a message and forward this to friends and family:
http://www.avaaz.org/en/libya_stop_the_crackdown/?vl
The people of Libya are being gunned down for demanding freedom, health, education and a decent wage -- basic needs that we all share. Today, as a global community, let's raise our voices from every corner of the world to condemn the shocking massacres, and together take action to end the bloodshed and support the Libyans' rightful call for change.
With hope and determination,
Alice, Ricken, Pascal, Graziela, Rewan and the entire Avaaz team
Sources
UN council to discuss Libya, Al Jazeera
http://english.aljazeera.net/news/middleeast/2011/02/2011221214022682385.htmlChoas and bloodshed in Libya
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/23/world/africa/23libya.html?_r=1&hpLive updates on Libya from the Guardian and the BBC:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/blog/2011/feb/22/libya-erupts-gaddafi-live-updates
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-12307698
Support the Avaaz community! We're entirely funded by donations and receive no money from governments or corporations. Our dedicated team ensures even the smallest contributions go a long way -- donate here.
Avaaz.org is a 7-million-person global campaign network that works to ensure that the views and values of the world's people shape global decision-making. ("Avaaz" means "voice" or "song" in many languages.) Avaaz members live in every nation of the world; our team is spread across 13 countries on 4 continents and operates in 14 languages. Learn about some of Avaaz's biggest campaigns here, or follow us on Facebook or Twitter.This message was sent to jwright@surfbvi.com. To change your email address, language, or other information, contact us via this form -- or simply click here to unsubscribe.
To contact Avaaz, please do not reply to this email. Instead, write to us at www.avaaz.org/en/contact or call us at +1-888-922-8229 (US).
Issues affecting VI’s vulnerable population in the forefront
Like |
Be the first of your friends to like this. |
Governor Boyd McCleary and members of the Social Vulnerability Technical Working Group meeting to discuss the way forward after the hazard impacts of 2010. Photo: courtesy of DDM
ROAD TOWN, Tortola, VI – Economic and social issues affecting the Virgin Islands vulnerable population were brought to the forefront at a recent meeting.
The meeting which was held on Thursday, February 17, 2011 was chaired by Governor William Boyd McCleary, and brought together the second of two newly formed Technical Working Groups (TWG) of the National Disaster Management Council (NDMC), previously approved by Cabinet, to address issues arising from the hazard impacts of 2010.
A Government issued press release on the meeting states that the overall objectives were to propose policies on the design of social safety nets and other targeted policy interventions; to reduce their vulnerability to natural hazards; and to evaluate current policies and programmes in areas such as enforcement of building codes, immigration and labour policies and environmental health standards.
The participants received a presentation from the DDM recapping the four main events of 2010; the July Flash Floods (July 20-21), Hurricane Earl (August 29 – 31), the September 19th Flash Floods and Tropical Storm Otto (September 30 – October 7). A number of “lessons learnt” were also presented.
Following the presentation, members of the Technical Working Group discussed possible ways of addressing the arising issues. Some of these recommendations include the development of policies, changes to legislation, greater enforcement of regulations and a more closely working relationship among agencies to tackle issues that are spread across various sectors.
The Group is expected to develop a plan of action over the next four weeks which will determine how the recommendations will be assigned and executed. The completed plan will be submitted to Cabinet by the Governor in his capacity as NDMC Chairman. It will address priority areas, suggested timeframes for addressing issues, performance measures, documentation of effective monitoring and a mechanism for capturing data.
The approved plan will then be complemented by a monitoring framework, which would include the development of progress reports against the agreed targets, to be submitted to Cabinet at various intervals.
The Technical Working Group is expected to serve for six months.
This is a message from the MailScanner E-Mail Virus Protection Service
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The original e-mail attachment "timthumb.php.png"
is on the list of unacceptable attachments for this site and has been
replaced by this warning message.
Act 2000, we were unable to keep a copy of the original attachment. At Sun Feb 20 17:52:51 2011 the virus scanner said:
Attempt to hide real filename extension (timthumb.php.png)
International Action Center - iacenter.org
About the IAC | Donate | IAC Books & Resources | Contact Us
CONFERENCE
FBI & Grand Jury Repression
Building Resistance
Saturday FEB. 19 1-5 p.m. |
Preemptive Prosecution, Entrapment
and Fahad Hashmi cases and Pardiss Kebriaei (Center for Constitutional Rights) on the Guantanamo cases.
Targeting of the Palestinian Movement, Labor Outreach, Religious Outreach and Media Outreach.
Also raided was the office of the Minneapolis–St. Paul based Anti-War Committee. The FBI subpoenaed fourteen activists in Illinois, Minnesota and Michigan to testify at a federal grand jury in Chicago. Then in December 2010, nine more people — all Palestinians or Palestine solidarity activists in Chicago — were ordered to testify before the same grand jury.
The U.S. government is trying to put people in jail for anti -war and international solidarity activism.
These people have done nothing wrong, yet their freedom is at stake.
the Republican National Convention in St. Paul, MN in September 2008. This is suppression of our democratic rights.
It threatens our families, our children and our communities. This is a U.S. government attempt to silence those who
support resistance to oppression in the Middle East and Latin America by putting people in jail.
or their organizing against war and occupation.
● Fight Imperialism Stand Together (FIST) ● NYC International Socialist Organization ● BAYAN USA
● Pakistan USA Freedom Forum ● May 1 Coalition for Workers & Immigrant Rights ● Muslim Solidarity Committee
● Friends and Family of the Abraham Lincoln Brigade ● Committees of Correspondence for Democracy and Socialism
● Marxist-Humanist Initiative ● Freedom Socialist Party ● Resistance in Brooklyn
● Al Awda Palestine Right to Return Coalition NY ● International Action Center
● Bethlehem Neighbors for Peace ● NYC School of the Americas Watch ● World Can't Wait
● War Resisters League ● Coney Island Avenue Project ● Free Mumia Coalition
● Picture The Homeless ● Brooklyn For Peace
● Workers World Party ● Todd Eaton of NYprotest ● Event Announcement Listserv ● Project SALAM
Some of the more well known deep events are briefly reviewed, such as the JFK assassination and Tonkin Gulf incident, as well as the plans known as Operation Northwoods. Scott also makes clear that he now sees 9/11 as not only a deep event, but a “constitutional deep event” in that the implementation of continuity of government (COG) plans, as a result of 9/11, means that the US constitution has been circumvented in favor of what former assistant attorney general, Jack Goldsmith, called the “Terror Presidency.” The latter office has been exploited by an influential power group, among whose major operatives are Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld, to pursue long-standing goals of US global domination at the expense of citizen protections as has been done with warrantless surveillance, warrantless detention and suspension of habeas corpus.
- Kevin Ryan's blog Login to post comments
- Login to post comments 1 vote
further in the deep state intrigue by reading Gold Warriors by the Seagraves.
- Login to post comments 1 vote
that started the Golden Eagle Trust after WWII has definitely been part of the problem, but out of the public’s view! It has caused a lot of suffering and mischief : it is an abscess that needs to be punctured!
Could you write a front page on this? I made a comment on the significance of this here : http://911blogger.com/news/2010-12-22/new-pentagon-videos-foia-release#comment-243505
Eric
- Login to post comments 0 votes
read Robert D. Steele's review at Amazon.com & then get the book. Jon
- Login to post comments 8 votes
There is a reason why your taxes funding our troops are being used to protect, rather than destroy the poppy fields in Afghanistan. And it has nothing to do with “helping the local farmers”.
- Login to post comments 5 votes
I remember right after 9/11 I was wondering why they didn't destroy the poppy fields. I had no idea that 9/11 was an inside job at the time. Now I know. The CIA is the biggest drug dealer in the world. Any time I hear "The War On Whatever" be it the War on Drugs or the War On Terror a red flag starts to fly in my head. I am always suspicious. “helping the local farmers” What a lame excuse that is.
- Login to post comments 6 votes
Here it is available on Amazon.com - more customer reviews there.
http://www.amazon.com/American-War-Machine-Connection-Afghanistan/dp/074...
Or here at Powell's Books - http://www.powells.com/biblio/1-9780742555945-0
- Login to post comments 3 votes
I feel I've gotten a good sense of what this book is about, will be buying it. PDS' "Road to 9/11" is one of the great books on 9/11.
Sometimes 'debunkers' say that a 9/11 conspiracy would have required thousands of people to carry out and cover up, and someone would talk. But heinous crimes are being committed w/o consequence all the time - now and then, certain facts make it into the news media, but often are not be widely covered, or they get spun/minimized. If something turns into a national scandal, there may be resignations, but usually no prosecution of anyone with great wealth/political influence, if there's even a criminal investigation.
Bush and Cheney admitted, on national TV, and Bush in his book, to authorizing torture, yet in the US there have been no consequences. Seems there may be a great many amoral or sociopathic people in the elite class, but even those among them who may not agree with or benefit from certain crimes or policies don't say or do anything for fear of disturbing the established social order which they, their progeny and their business partners are profiting from.
In his book "Opposing the System,” Charles A. Reich says: “The elite live in a different country than the rest of Americans. It is not possible to understand the System and its actions without understanding this fact. The elite sees its own ascendancy as just, and cannot understand the anger below. Yet the rules for success used by the elite are often very different from the rules observed by ordinary people. This leads the elite to believe that those below ‘cannot be told’ the real reason for decisions that are made. The question becomes what should the people be told, not what are the facts. The perplexity of the voter who tries first one party and then the other, winding up always with the same elite, shows how democracy has given way to the rule of the System’s managers. Shared knowledge leads to shared assumptions, which are even more crucial than knowledge in making it possible for the elite managers to work together without ‘conspiracy.’ These invisible shared assumptions are the real Constitution, the real fundamental law, which guides the System” (1995:49).
- Login to post comments 6 votes
Your impressions have certainly compelled me to educate myself better on this by reading his book!
You can also add your review to the “customer reviews” on Amazon: http://www.amazon.com/American-War-Machine-Connection-Afghanistan/dp/0742555941
On Oct. 16th 2010 “Maverick Media” did an 80 min interview of Peter Dale Scott about his new book in his home in Berkley, California. It is posted on VIMEO in three parts:
Peter Dale Scott - part 1 - American War Machine
Peter Dale Scott - part 2 - American War Machine
Peter Dale Scott - part 3 - American War Machine
Peter Dale Scott avoids using the concept “Deep State” too much with regards to what has been going wrong with the US. It is more identified as Eisenhower’s “Military Industrial Complex”, or as Peter Dale Scott puts it “The American War Machine”, where elements from “the over-world” have reached deeply into the media, and even the academy, and also developed a more and more highly concentrated secret apparatus that gets us involved in wars. Having under-world proxy elements (carefully planned full deniability, but you get the picture, as you start connecting the dots!) to create the strategy of tension and to maintain the “War on Terror” is now a well documented technique.
At the 25 min mark in the third video, (see links above) Peter Dale Scott defines “The Force X” : “I think there is a cumulative picture of bad decisions made particularly in the CIA to ally themselves with under-world elements and with drug trafficking elements which has contributed… or it turned us in Asia from having a defense establishment into what is clear now, into what was having an offence establishment, and it’s the offence establishment that got us into Vietnam and to Iraq and to Afghanistan and we have to go back into having a defense establishment – but to deal with that, you’ve got to deal with all the factors I talk about in my book.”
Thank-you for high-lighting this book, Kevin, and thank-you especially Peter Dale Scott for taking such care to educate us on these important issues that our main stream media has not yet grasped.
Perhaps the MSM in Tunisia and Egypt will be talking about it long before our still censored media catches on. In Belgium, the RTBF has taken a courageous step to start documenting CIA financed terror in Europe with the French film by Emmanuel Amara from December 2010: “Les armées secrètes de l'Otan - 1950-1990 Le scandale des armées secrètes de l'OTAN” http://www.rtbf.be/tv/revoir/detail_les-armees-secretes-de-l-otan?uid=59381221668&idshedule=3708d91822f2eccfef97d93f58126488&catchupId=10-TCQAD845-000-PR-1&serieId= or http://www.dpstream.net/film-1950-1990-le-scandale-des-armees-secretes-de-l-otan-en-streaming-162225.html
Dr Eric Beeth http://patriotsquestion911.com/medical.html#Beeth
Why can’t the US legalize drugs? There’s ‘too much money in it,’ Clinton says
In what will likely be seen as something of a Freudian slip by the US Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton said recently in a Mexican news interview that the United States cannot legalize drugs as a means of fighting the black market because "there is just too much money in it."
Asked by Denise Maerker of Televisa what she thought of drug legalization, Clinton said it was unlikely to work.
"There is just too much money in it," Clinton said. "You can legalize small amounts for possession, but those who are making so much money selling, they have to be stopped. They can’t be given an even easier road to take, because they will then find it in their interest to addict even more young people."
The comments drew criticism from legalization advocates who argued her position was a misunderstanding of the situation.
"Clinton's response illustrates not only the intellectual bankruptcy of the prohibitionist position but the economic ignorance of a woman who would be president," Jacob Sullum argued at Reason.com.
At the Drug War Chronicle, Scott Morgan called Clinton's argument "perfectly incoherent" and argued it flew in the face of economic theory.
Clinton's interview focused mainly on Mexico's drug war, which was launched in 2006 by President Felipe Calderon and has cost an estimated 34,000 lives, including more than 1,000 minors.
The toll's severity prompted former Mexican President Vicente Fox to come out in favor of legalizing drugs as a way of taking the steam out of organized crime.
President Calderon has not gone as far himself, but did approve legislation decriminalizing possession of small amounts of most recreational drugs, and has called for a debate on new approaches to dealing with drugs.
Author and Blogger for 'The Nation'
The new memoir by former Pentagon chief Donald Rumsfeld has drawn wide criticism for his failure to accept any blame on the Iraq and Afghanistan fiascoes, and his claims that when he and others promoted falsehoods about Iraq WMD they were merely minor "misstatements," not lies. But among his other misdeeds was offering misleading statements to the American public about the progress of the war in Iraq, often blaming journalists for being far too critical.
WikiLeaks' massive "war logs" release on Iraq last October exposed Rumsfeld in this regard over and over, but were quickly forgotten by mainstream journalists -- even though the material was not "political" or even from the media but rather from U.S. soldiers on the ground. That's one reason I cover them in-depth (along with all the other WIkiLeaks releases and current controversies) in my new book The Age of WikiLeaks.
There are far too many examples exposing Rumsfeld's guilt, but the best brief illustration comes in the following. When Ellen Knickmeyer covered the Iraq war, at its worst point, for the Washington Post, we profiled her at my old magazine Editor & Publisher, and I stayed in touch with her long afterward, and to this day, as she moved on. Among other things, she is filing pieces for the Foreign Policy site now.
Here's an excerpt from what Knickmeyer wrote at the Daily Beast shortly after the Iraq war logs emerged, as their import was being trashed by her former employer, the Washington Post, and many politicians and pundits. The headline told it all: "WikiLeaks Exposes Rumsfeld's Lies."
"In the dark morning hours of Feb. 22, 2006," she recalled, "a group of unknown attackers detonated bombs in the northern Iraqi city of Samarra, bringing down the golden dome of a revered Shia Muslim shrine....During visits to Baghdad's morgue over the next two days, I saw Sunni families thronging to find the bodies of loved ones killed by the militias. The morgue's computer registrar told the grim-faced families and me that we would have to be patient; the morgue had taken in more than 1,000 bodies since the Samarra bombing, and was way behind on processing corpses."
Donald Rumsfeld held a news conference at the Pentagon to say that U.S. press reports of killings--such as mine that estimated 1,300 dead in the immediate aftermath of the bombing, based on what I had seen at the morgue, interviews with Sunni survivors, U.N. and Iraq health officials--were calculated "exaggerated reporting.'" Iraqi security forces, he said, "were taking the lead in controlling the situation," everything he assured his listeners was "calming."
American journalists in Baghdad were under attack not just from Iraqi insurgents, but, at least verbally, from our own country's civilian and military commanders as well.
Of course, "calming" was a lie and many months of vicious sectarian violence continued. "Thanks to WikiLeaks, though," Knickmeyer concluded, "I now know the extent to which top American leaders lied, knowingly, to the American public, to American troops, and to the world, as the Iraq mission exploded. The American troops, who were risking their lives on the ground, witnessed and documented it themselves... Despite the statements of the top U.S. commanders at the time, it wasn't the journalists in Baghdad who were lying."
Greg Mitchell's "The Age of WikiLeaks" is his eleventh book, also out as an e-book. He live-blogs WikiLeaks daily at The Nation.
The former defense secretary channels Glenn Beck as he bashes Obama and kisses Rush Limbaugh's behind VIDEO
-
- Like
-
- 40
- Joan Walsh is Salon's editor at large. More: Joan Walsh
- Donald Rumsfeld was right about everything, book by Rumsfeld claims
- The former defense secretary's memoir attempts to set the record straight on how great Rumsfeld was
- BY ALEX PAREENESUNDAY, DEC 31, 1899
The Donald Rumsfeld "Don't blame me" tour continued this week, as the former defense secretary hawks his book "Known and Unknown." I've tried to ignore him. There's no news in his revelations, or in his settling old scores with Colin Powell, Condoleezza Rice, L. Paul Bremer and even George H.W. Bush. But Tuesday I couldn't help paying attention to Rumsfeld, as he went on the Rush Limbaugh show, kissed Limbaugh's massive ... ego, and cast his lot with the Glenn Beck Brigade, warning that radical Islam wants to establish, yes, a caliphate.
Here's what he said:
We are up against a vicious enemy, the radical Islamists are there, they intend to try to create a caliphate in this world and fundamentally alter the nature of nation states, and we're reluctant to engage in the competition of ideas and point out what they really are and how vicious they are. This current administration is even afraid to say the word Islamist. And we need to fight. We need to be willing to say what it is and be willing to tackle it. And thank goodness for people like you who are willing to do it.
Thank goodness for people like Rush!
I understand why Limbaugh and Beck peddle the caliphate notion; they make money on fear. But Rumsfeld joining the charge is remarkable. That a former defense secretary would express such ignorance about Islam -- generalizing about a global religion that's divided Sunni from Shia, radical from reformer, al-Qaida vs. the vast majority, and in so many more ways -- is stunning. At a moment when more conservatives are denouncing Beck's crusade, Rumsfeld casts his lot with the fear-mongers.
I'm not sure why Rumsfeld needs the Obama administration to use the word "Islamist." It makes sense to zero in on violent Islamic fundamentalism, not the whole religion. It's also ridiculous to say we're not engaging in the "competition of ideas"; in fact, freedom of religion and expression are two of our best assets in that competition, but wingnuts don't like either. It's clear that Rummy's rehab tour is aimed to shore up his standing with conservatives, not the whole country. In the book and in interviews, he's toughest on Powell, who's hated by the far right, and soft on his boss, President Bush. The far right misses no opportunity to insinuate or say flat-out that Barack Hussein Obama is soft on our Muslim enemies. I didn't think much was beneath Rumsfeld, but he reached a new low with Limbaugh today.
I talked about it on MSNBC's "Hardball" today with Chris Matthews and David Corn:
Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and
Amnesty International and other groups asked Swiss authorities to investigate the former president for torture VIDEO
-
- Like
-
- 3K
Will George W. Bush set foot in Europe again in his lifetime?
A planned trip by Bush to speak at the Switzerland-based United Israel Appeal later this week has been canceled after several human rights groups called for Swiss authorities to arrest Bush and investigate him for authorizing torture. Bush has traveled widely since leaving office, but not to Europe, where there is a strong tradition of international prosecutions.
The Swiss group and Bush's spokesman claim that it was threats of protest, not of legal action, that prompted the cancellation. But facing protests is nothing new for Bush. What was different about this trip was that groups including Amnesty International and the Center for Constitutional Rights argued that Switzerland, as a party to the UN Convention against Torture, is obligated to investigate Bush for potential prosecution.
Amnesty's memo to Swiss authorities cites, among other things, Bush's admission in his own memoir that he approved the use of waterboarding. From Amnesty's press release:
“To date, we’ve seen a handful of military investigations into detentions and interrogations in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Guantánamo. But none of these has had the independence and reach necessary to investigate high-level officials such as President Bush,” said Salil Shetty, Secretary General of Amnesty International.
“Meanwhile, there has been virtually zero accountability for crimes committed in the CIA’s secret detention program, which was authorized by then-President Bush.”
Anywhere in the world that he travels, President Bush could face investigation and potential prosecution for his responsibility for torture and other crimes in international law, particularly in any of the 147 countries that are party to the UN Convention against Torture.
“As the US authorities have, so far, failed to bring President Bush to justice, the international community must step in," said Salil Shetty.
The Center for Constitutional Rights, meanwhile, intended to file a 2,500-page complaint against Bush in Swiss court on behalf of two Guantanamo detainees. The group will release that complaint to the public today.